sanjay02
07-11 01:07 AM
Hi
I am in my 8th year H1-B( came in 1999 first to USA) extension based on pending I-140 & I-485 , I have my 2nd EAD in So now my question is
Is it safe for me to switch to EAD or keep extending my H1-B till I have my I-140 and 485 is approved? My I-140 has been pending for the last 2 yrs because of the FBI security checks etc. Since my H1-B extension beyond 6 yrs is based on pending I-140 and I-485 does it really make sense to keep extending it since I have to pay from my end my employer doesnt pay for it or is it better to be on EAD?
Thnks
I am in my 8th year H1-B( came in 1999 first to USA) extension based on pending I-140 & I-485 , I have my 2nd EAD in So now my question is
Is it safe for me to switch to EAD or keep extending my H1-B till I have my I-140 and 485 is approved? My I-140 has been pending for the last 2 yrs because of the FBI security checks etc. Since my H1-B extension beyond 6 yrs is based on pending I-140 and I-485 does it really make sense to keep extending it since I have to pay from my end my employer doesnt pay for it or is it better to be on EAD?
Thnks
wallpaper Kabul City Center
sandeep12
06-06 04:19 PM
Any idea if physicians are included in this category this time around? Thanks in advance.
abc
06-14 02:21 PM
With this mejob workload of I-140 filiing in next 2 months, I-140 procesing times will again retrogress.
so, can we change jobs even after 6 months of I-485 submission ??
Is I-140 approval required for AC21
so, can we change jobs even after 6 months of I-485 submission ??
Is I-140 approval required for AC21
2011 modern Kabul City Centre
nixstor
08-17 02:59 PM
Live Telephone Assistance
Call 1-800-829-1040 . For further information
Call them and tell your status and ask him/her your specific questions.
They will give the correct and upto date information. They are very helpful and fully knowledgable of the tax law. You can even get the ID number of the person whom you spoke with for your reference.
Call 1-800-829-1040 . For further information
Call them and tell your status and ask him/her your specific questions.
They will give the correct and upto date information. They are very helpful and fully knowledgable of the tax law. You can even get the ID number of the person whom you spoke with for your reference.
more...
maheshf
10-13 02:37 PM
I am in an interesting situation, my 485 is pending (PD June 22, 2006) and wondering if I should accept a position offered by my original GC employer, special when my PD is so close ( May take another 6-8 month).
I was part of company lets say X, a join venture between A&B. X applied for my GC 140 and 485 when I was with them. Then that company was split and 10% employee went to A and other 90% to B. I was part of 10% that went to A and did AC21 to port my case. It was considered as new company. Now my Old manager who moved to company B is offering a Job with significant promotion. Since X was technical acquired by B and X was my original employer, is it a win win situation to move or I stay put and wait for PD to become current before moving? job profile is goign to be same.
I was part of company lets say X, a join venture between A&B. X applied for my GC 140 and 485 when I was with them. Then that company was split and 10% employee went to A and other 90% to B. I was part of 10% that went to A and did AC21 to port my case. It was considered as new company. Now my Old manager who moved to company B is offering a Job with significant promotion. Since X was technical acquired by B and X was my original employer, is it a win win situation to move or I stay put and wait for PD to become current before moving? job profile is goign to be same.
gina_raluca
03-16 03:17 PM
There has been an error in the processing of my I-130 petition for my mother. It was approved and now I am being asked to submit form I-485 or form I-824. The problem is that my mother is not and has never been to the US. I called CIS and talked to a representative about the error. She said she would send a letter to the CIS about it and that I should hear back from CIS in 5 days. I am just wondering if this timeline is realistic or I should expect it to take more time. Should I contact my senator and ask for assistance in facilitating this process? Would hiring a lawyer expedite this process? I know that the petition should then go to the NVC. Would a lawyer help?
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
more...
ritwik_ind
10-26 10:00 AM
Hi there,
This is my post for the contest. :eye:
http://http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpghttp://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpg
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpg
hope you like it, [Wish me luck!! ]
Cheers,
Twik
Mans mind, once stretched by an idea, never attains its original dimensions.
This is my post for the contest. :eye:
http://http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpghttp://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpg
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7766/lostil.jpg
hope you like it, [Wish me luck!! ]
Cheers,
Twik
Mans mind, once stretched by an idea, never attains its original dimensions.
2010 ^inside the Kabul City Center
Blog Feeds
10-04 11:10 PM
What a piece of work from the man who warned us about death panels in the health care bill. His grasp of the facts don't seem to be much better when it comes to USCIS' enforcement of H-1B rules. From this letter, you would think USCIS is sitting around eating bon bons and not engaged in one of the most serious crackdowns in the H-1B program in decades. Most immigration lawyers who saw this memo today are probably scratching their heads because they've recently gotten requests for evidence asking for exactly the kind of documentation Grassley complains USCIS is not...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/10/grassley-letter-mayorkas-takes-uscis-to-task.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/10/grassley-letter-mayorkas-takes-uscis-to-task.html)
more...
nlssubbu
05-17 03:04 PM
It is safe to apply for N-400 after 90 days prior to 5 years and your wife can wait and apply in another couple of months.
hair Inside a Kabul shopping centre
Macaca
03-06 08:44 PM
Some paras from Testing Time for Democrats (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/05/AR2007030501185.html)
The story of the new Congress is actually two stories. Democratic leaders and their grass-roots supporters will decide in the coming days which narrative will prevail.
In January, Democrats dominated the news, the public agenda and the Republicans. In the last weeks of February, the Republicans came back -- not by offering grand proposals but by using the limited tools they have to prove that Democrats don't have enough power, yet, to end the war in Iraq.
When they took control, Democrats looked crisp and disciplined, attributes not normally associated with their party. Speaker Nancy Pelosi's House quickly passed the Democrats' popular campaign promises, including measures on the minimum wage, stem cell research, renewable energy and reforms of the student loan and Medicare prescription drug programs.
This agenda had its skeptics, but it provided focus for a party long out of power and drew significant Republican defections, feeding a raft of "Republicans in Disarray" stories. Pelosi noted at a January news conference that so many Republicans voted for the Democratic proposals that one of her colleagues joked: "Maybe you made these bills too easy."
The Senate Democrats quickly pushed through a different version of the minimum-wage increase, and the party's leading foreign policy voices framed a critique of President Bush's Iraq policy that squared with the public's increasingly skeptical view of the war.
But recent weeks have held nothing but trouble for Democrats -- and it is odd, as one Democrat noted, that they should be on the defensive when the scandal over the treatment of wounded veterans at Walter Reed Army Medical Center has focused attention on yet another failed aspect of the administration's execution of the war and its aftermath.
Instead, one news story after another has highlighted differences among congressional Democrats over how to end the war. There is also the divide between the Washington party and activists at the grass roots and in the blogosphere. All of these problems are rooted in two unalterable facts: Democrats, on the basis of their thin majorities in Congress, lack the numbers to force an unwilling president to alter his course. And they are short of votes to cut off funds for the war altogether.
My Comments
Dems are not united on most issues.
Although this article is on Iraq, a similar situation will occur on Immigration. The big difference is that Dems are very interested in Iraq (they won elections on Iraq) whereas I haven't seen much much Democratic interest on Immigration.
The story of the new Congress is actually two stories. Democratic leaders and their grass-roots supporters will decide in the coming days which narrative will prevail.
In January, Democrats dominated the news, the public agenda and the Republicans. In the last weeks of February, the Republicans came back -- not by offering grand proposals but by using the limited tools they have to prove that Democrats don't have enough power, yet, to end the war in Iraq.
When they took control, Democrats looked crisp and disciplined, attributes not normally associated with their party. Speaker Nancy Pelosi's House quickly passed the Democrats' popular campaign promises, including measures on the minimum wage, stem cell research, renewable energy and reforms of the student loan and Medicare prescription drug programs.
This agenda had its skeptics, but it provided focus for a party long out of power and drew significant Republican defections, feeding a raft of "Republicans in Disarray" stories. Pelosi noted at a January news conference that so many Republicans voted for the Democratic proposals that one of her colleagues joked: "Maybe you made these bills too easy."
The Senate Democrats quickly pushed through a different version of the minimum-wage increase, and the party's leading foreign policy voices framed a critique of President Bush's Iraq policy that squared with the public's increasingly skeptical view of the war.
But recent weeks have held nothing but trouble for Democrats -- and it is odd, as one Democrat noted, that they should be on the defensive when the scandal over the treatment of wounded veterans at Walter Reed Army Medical Center has focused attention on yet another failed aspect of the administration's execution of the war and its aftermath.
Instead, one news story after another has highlighted differences among congressional Democrats over how to end the war. There is also the divide between the Washington party and activists at the grass roots and in the blogosphere. All of these problems are rooted in two unalterable facts: Democrats, on the basis of their thin majorities in Congress, lack the numbers to force an unwilling president to alter his course. And they are short of votes to cut off funds for the war altogether.
My Comments
Dems are not united on most issues.
Although this article is on Iraq, a similar situation will occur on Immigration. The big difference is that Dems are very interested in Iraq (they won elections on Iraq) whereas I haven't seen much much Democratic interest on Immigration.
more...
GCisLottery
07-18 11:25 AM
Listen to this: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5564537
Two women who have been longtime employees in a Pittsburgh federal building, as cafeteria workers, are back on the job. They had been fired and told they failed to pass their national security background check.
In the middle you will hear:
Someone "misread" the social security number
This is not related to GC, but gives a glimpse of the quality of security background check. May be compared to FBI name check.
Two women who have been longtime employees in a Pittsburgh federal building, as cafeteria workers, are back on the job. They had been fired and told they failed to pass their national security background check.
In the middle you will hear:
Someone "misread" the social security number
This is not related to GC, but gives a glimpse of the quality of security background check. May be compared to FBI name check.
hot kabul city center.
franklin
01-03 08:52 PM
Don't worry
My greencard was approved 4 months ago and I still don't have the receipts.
My greencard was approved 4 months ago and I still don't have the receipts.
more...
house Kabul City Centre
ags123
06-18 03:40 PM
Hi
I was planning to use Zhang and associates services for filing AOS and wanted to find out if any of the members here had good experience or other experiences with the firm.
http://www.hooyou.com/
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks
A
I was planning to use Zhang and associates services for filing AOS and wanted to find out if any of the members here had good experience or other experiences with the firm.
http://www.hooyou.com/
Please share your thoughts.
Thanks
A
tattoo kabul city pictures. Kabul
Blog Feeds
10-23 09:20 AM
Further to one of our more recent posts, it isn�t just the economy driving the �brain drain� associated with the ever-increasing numbers of talented workers opting to leave the U.S. Rather, the unrealistic immigrant visa quotas for employment-based green cards are also to blame as a formidable obstacle contributing to this recent trend. The much-anticipated October visa bulletin issued by the Department of State did little to give new hope to the long line of skilled workers waiting for available immigrant visa numbers. Indeed, with quotas backlogged more than 7 years in the skilled worker category, countless thousands of talented...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2009/09/the-h1b-brain-drain-its-not-the-economy-stupid.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2009/09/the-h1b-brain-drain-its-not-the-economy-stupid.html)
more...
pictures makeup to the city centre,
gcformeornot
01-29 10:04 PM
I meant on IV page......
dresses Inside Kabul City Center Other
goel_ar
11-06 01:37 PM
http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/New%20Structure/3rd%20Level%20%28Left%20Nav%20Children%29/Green%20Card%20-%203rd%20Level/Pending%20Form%20I485%20Reports.pdf
In above link, how is it possible to have pending I-485 (EB2) for 2008 & 2009 for India? If i remember correctly the priority date for India has reached upto Jul 2007 only so far.
could someone pl. educate me?
thanks,
In above link, how is it possible to have pending I-485 (EB2) for 2008 & 2009 for India? If i remember correctly the priority date for India has reached upto Jul 2007 only so far.
could someone pl. educate me?
thanks,
more...
makeup City Centre and Walls of Bala
logiclife
02-04 04:35 PM
Thanks a lot to all the volunteers working to spread the word and generate awareness.
--logiclife.
--logiclife.
girlfriend ^inside the Kabul City Center
tapsemi
10-29 06:57 PM
How many times is someone allowed to file for H1b extension after 6th year? I am on the 8th year H1b extension. My I-140 is in process right now.
hairstyles Kabul. Photo: Wikipedia
pthoko
08-29 06:56 AM
^^^^^^^^^
moveahead123
11-05 02:43 AM
http://www.competeamerica.org/hill/letter_congress/index.html
rajkumar_engg
03-12 03:02 PM
yes, good point.. .this will boost the economy... think of the ripple effects!
