famous paintings of love

images Painting art

Feeding With Love

tikka

06-03 02:57 PM

http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=4730


People are asking for IV's position on various issues that affect them personally or asking IV to push A, B, C and D ...provisons. Everything depends on how much resources we can put to bare and collectively make an effort. This means, contributions from everyone , Phonecalls to Senators tomorrow onwards from everyone , Webfaxes from everyone , emails to all senators (from all IV members) and of course get as many members as you can to join this effort. We need overwhelming participation from each and every member if we really want to accomplish something big for everyone that takes care of all our interests.

---

wallpaper Feeding With Love

famous paintings of love.

Jimi_Hendrix

11-08 07:02 PM

California U.S. House results by county
Alameda - District 9 100.0% of 548 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Barbara Lee (I)
Dem 117,157 85.6%
John den Dulk
GOP 15,647 11.4%
James Eyer Lib 4,001 2.9%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Alameda - District 10 100.0% of 88 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Ellen Tauscher (I)
Dem 12,005 60.6%
Darcy Linn
GOP 7,792 39.4%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Alameda - District 11 100.0% of 99 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Jerry McNerney
Dem 15,385 62.2%
Richard Pombo (I)
GOP 9,348 37.8%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Alameda - District 13 100.0% of 484 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Fortney Stark (I)
Dem 83,777 74.2%
George Bruno
GOP 29,127 25.8%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Alpine - District 3 100.0% of 5 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Bill Durston
Dem 258 49.8%
Dan Lungren (I)
GOP 243 46.9%
Douglas Tuma Lib 14 2.7%
Michael Roskey PFP 3 0.6%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Amador - District 3 100.0% of 59 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Dan Lungren (I)
GOP 8,408 62.6%
Bill Durston
Dem 4,633 34.5%
Douglas Tuma Lib 277 2.1%
Michael Roskey PFP 121 0.9%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Butte - District 2 100.0% of 139 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Wally Herger (I)
GOP 23,958 56.0%
A. J. Sekhon
Dem 17,053 39.9%
E. Kent Hinesley Lib 1,743 4.1%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Butte - District 4 100.0% of 36 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
John Doolittle (I)
GOP 5,380 54.8%
Charlie Brown
Dem 3,830 39.0%
Dan Warren Lib 605 6.2%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Calaveras - District 3 100.0% of 30 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Dan Lungren (I)
GOP 9,092 60.4%
Bill Durston
Dem 5,332 35.4%
Douglas Tuma Lib 392 2.6%
Michael Roskey PFP 229 1.5%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Colusa - District 2 100.0% of 17 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Wally Herger (I)
GOP 3,208 71.2%
A. J. Sekhon
Dem 1,211 26.9%
E. Kent Hinesley Lib 87 1.9%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Contra Costa - District 7 100.0% of 325 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
George Miller (I)
Dem 60,515 86.2%
Camden McConnell Lib 9,681 13.8%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Contra Costa - District 10 100.0% of 566 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Ellen Tauscher (I)
Dem 78,029 68.2%
Darcy Linn
GOP 36,436 31.8%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Contra Costa - District 11 100.0% of 141 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Jerry McNerney
Dem 22,853 54.0%
Richard Pombo (I)
GOP 19,459 46.0%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Del Norte - District 1 90.0% of 20 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Mike Thompson (I)
Dem 3,439 57.1%
John Jones
GOP 2,398 39.8%
Pamela Elizondo Grn 106 1.8%
Timothy Stock PFP 85 1.4%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

El Dorado - District 4 100.0% of 150 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
John Doolittle (I)
GOP 25,650 50.5%
Charlie Brown
Dem 22,582 44.4%
Dan Warren Lib 2,590 5.1%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Fresno - District 18 100.0% of 5 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
John Kanno
GOP 317 56.7%
Dennis Cardoza (I)
Dem 242 43.3%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Fresno - District 19 100.0% of 220 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
George Radanovich (I)
GOP 28,106 58.7%
TJ Cox
Dem 19,783 41.3%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Fresno - District 21 100.0% of 265 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Devin Nunes (I)
GOP 37,210 65.8%
Steven Haze
Dem 17,353 30.7%
John Miller Grn 1,989 3.5%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Glenn - District 2 100.0% of 33 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Wally Herger (I)
GOP 5,299 71.7%
A. J. Sekhon
Dem 1,915 25.9%
E. Kent Hinesley Lib 178 2.4%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Humboldt - District 1 100.0% of 152 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Mike Thompson (I)
Dem 26,617 65.8%
John Jones
GOP 11,910 29.4%
Pamela Elizondo Grn 1,327 3.3%
Timothy Stock PFP 611 1.5%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Imperial - District 51 100.0% of 146 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Bob Filner (I)
Dem 11,338 66.5%
Blake Miles
GOP 5,270 30.9%
Dan Litwin Lib 435 2.6%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Inyo - District 25 100.0% of 27 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Buck McKeon (I)
GOP 3,244 61.3%
Robert Rodriguez
Dem 1,821 34.4%
David Erickson Lib 225 4.3%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Kern - District 22 100.0% of 442 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Kevin McCarthy
GOP 81,725 74.4%
Sharon Beery
Dem 28,059 25.6%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Lake - District 1 100.0% of 52 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Mike Thompson (I)
Dem 9,546 62.8%
John Jones
GOP 4,959 32.6%
Pamela Elizondo Grn 362 2.4%
Timothy Stock PFP 335 2.2%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Lassen - District 4 100.0% of 35 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
John Doolittle (I)
GOP 4,546 60.1%
Charlie Brown
Dem 2,544 33.6%
Dan Warren Lib 479 6.3%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 22 100.0% of 42 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Kevin McCarthy
GOP 8,577 63.2%
Sharon Beery
Dem 5,001 36.8%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 25 100.0% of 299 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Buck McKeon (I)
GOP 61,696 61.5%
Robert Rodriguez
Dem 34,403 34.3%
David Erickson Lib 4,210 4.2%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 26 100.0% of 271 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
David Dreier (I)
GOP 59,108 57.0%
Cynthia Matthews
Dem 39,770 38.4%
Ted Brown Lib 3,098 3.0%
Elliott Graham AIP 1,646 1.6%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 27 100.0% of 348 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Brad Sherman (I)
Dem 82,571 69.0%
Peter Hankwitz
GOP 37,163 31.0%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 28 100.0% of 277 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Howard Berman (I)
Dem 70,560 74.0%
Stanley Kesselman
GOP 18,210 19.1%
Byron De Lear Grn 3,340 3.5%
Kelley Ross Lib 3,190 3.3%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 29 100.0% of 369 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Adam Schiff (I)
Dem 79,001 63.6%
William Bodell
GOP 34,184 27.5%
William Paparian Grn 6,821 5.5%
Lynda Llamas PFP 2,244 1.8%
Jim Keller Lib 1,933 1.6%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 30 100.0% of 504 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Henry Waxman (I)
Dem 130,787 71.4%
David Jones
GOP 48,614 26.5%
Adele Cannon PFP 3,895 2.1%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 32 100.0% of 277 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Hilda Solis (I)
Dem 67,453 83.0%
Leland Faegre Lib 13,824 17.0%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 34 100.0% of 222 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Lucille Roybal-Allard (I)
Dem 50,961 76.9%
Wayne Miller
GOP 15,272 23.1%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

Los Angeles - District 35 100.0% of 295 precincts reporting

Candidate Party Vote Count % Votes Cast
Maxine Waters (I)
Dem 72,114 83.7%
Gordon Mego AIP 7,314 8.5%
Paul Ireland Lib 6,761 7.8%
Updated: 11/8/2006 7:43 PM ET

---

The Famous Paintings of

radhay

04-17 01:59 PM

I have closed on two mortgage loans recently and found that Loan Underwriters don't understand EAD/ AOS applications. For my original loan with Pulte Mortgage I explained them that AOS is a period authroized stay by Attorney General until Green card is approved. When they still didn't understand I had to bump my down payment to 20% which apparently puts less resrtictions (By Fannie Mae guidelines).

When I refinanced this week with PFCU (pentagan federal CU) I sent them EAD copies and they were OK with it.

---

2011 famous paintings of love.

of famous Scream painting)

pappu

07-11 11:34 AM

EB2 benefited from EB1 spillover once this bucket is full - I'm sure EB3 will move a great deal.

Another reason could also be EB2ROW spillover.

It is unfortunate for EB3 folks that their dates are not moving.

Let us wait for the official DOS bulletin and see what reasons they give to advance the dates significantly. Else IV can contact DOS to know how these projections were made.

---

more...

makeup Famous Paintings

jetflyer

06-10 09:20 AM

There is a chance of EB1 & EB2 ROW spillover :D

US bulletin is out too:

http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4252.html

EMPLOYMENT SECOND PREFERENCE VISA AVAILABILITY

There have been questions raised regarding the way numbers have been provided to the China and India in the Employment Second preference categories beginning in April. Section 202(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states that if total demand for visas in an Employment preference category is insufficient to use all available visa numbers in that category in a calendar quarter, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limit. (For example: If the second preference annual limit were 40,000, number use by �All Other Countries� were estimated to be only 25,000, and the China/India combined number use based on their per-country limits were 6,000, then there would be 9,000 numbers unused. Those 9,000 numbers could then be made available to China and India applicants without regard to their per-country limits.)

Based on the informaiton available, it was been determined that the demand from �All Other Countries� for Second preference numbers, plus the amount of numbers available under China and India Second preference per-country limit, would be insufficient to utilize all available numbers under the annual limit for this category. Therefore, pursuant to Section 202(a)(5) of the Act, the unused numbers have been made available to China and India Second preference applicants. Since Section 203(e)(1) of the Act requires that such unused numbers be made available strictly in priority date order, the China and India applicants have been subject to the identical cut-off date. As there are more Employment Second preference applicants from India and the Indian applicants may have earlier priority dates, it is likely that Indian applicants will receive a larger portion of the available numbers than Chinese applicants.

It should be noted that the Employment Second preference category is "Current" for all countries except China and India. If at any point it appears that demand from �All Other Countries� would utilize all available numbers, then an adjustment would be made to the China/India cut-off date. Therefore, providing the unused numbers to China and India in no way disadvantages applicants from any other country, and helps to insure that the worldwide annual limit can be reached.

EMPLOYMENT THIRD PREFERENCE VISA AVAILABILITY

Demand for numbers, primarily by USCIS for adjustment of status cases, will bring the entire Employment Third preference category to the annual numerical limit by the end of June. As a result, this category will become �unavailable� beginning in July and will remain so for the remainder of FY-2008. Such action will only be temporary, however, and Employment Third preference availability will return to the cut-off dates established for June in October, the first month of the new fiscal year.

---

Famous Love Scenes In Pictures

WeShallOvercome

07-20 05:29 PM

And who says only Matthew Oh has all the right to create sensations ! :)

If you are determined to make sensational calculations and postings then who can stop you, but seriously stop assuming things.

1st assumption: 750000 applicants (realistic figure near 500,000)
2nd assumption: all are adults (why would kids need EAD, and there would be several in that category)
3. it takes only 5 mts could take more or less who knows,
4. work hrs
5. number of people.

Stop being so negative and sensationalizing everything. There are more genuine problems to talk about.

---

more...

famous paintings of love. love

gc_chahiye

09-28 06:55 PM

not that it makes a huge difference, are they atleast trying to use some of the visa numbers by working over this weekend???

they are working overtime on receipting (see the FAQ). Wish they stop receipting for these last 2-3 days and use up ALL the visa numbers. Everyone should be put into I-485 approval work. If there are people stuck in NC, see if any of the June/July filers manage to pass the FBI database without a hit.

A receipt notice coming 2 days late is not a big deal. If a visa number is not used up, its lost, gone forever!

---

2010 The Famous Paintings of

Painting art

chanduv23

08-12 11:29 AM

Almost all companies, in every field (engg, medicine, nursing, research..) hire people through contracting agencies. Most of the companies these days hire only US citizens or GC or EAD and try best not to hire H1b and if you look at their employees, it is rare to find 50% or more h1b holders.

On the contrary, outsourcing companies may have majority of their workers coming here on L1 or H1b and when such a fgee is imposed, I guess, for the biggies, it is just a small adjustment in their costs of bringing workers which they will adjust in their other expenses.

Overall, I am not sure, how much revenue such a law will generate. Will it generate enough revenue which is being claimed (600 million?)

To me, this kinda speech and trashing Indian companies and outsourcing etc... and showing that they acted on it just looks like it is pure politics to save face during the election year.

---

more...

hair famous paintings. I LOVE

IV2007

04-02 11:20 AM

Guys,

I read through all of your posts.

One question I am not clear is:
I am on H1-B. I don't intend to change my status.

I start my LLC & work part time in the LLC on EAD. Is this possible ?

I am not sure if H1 gets invalidated by doing this. If so, the only alternative I found is hire others to do it or open a partnership LLC.

Am I correct ?

---

hair of famous Scream painting)

Tags: famous paintings android

pappu

12-16 03:37 PM

I'snt tracker broken (Sorting by PD ) for some time now.

We will improve it soon. But the data is still useful.

---

more...

[SOMALIA] - 4 Famous Paintings

snathan

02-08 02:08 PM

Stop sending money to parents and in-laws, if its possible. Otherwise, maintain parity by sending money in small amounts to both parents. Its stupid to say my wife is not working so she has no business to send money to her parents. Its so wrong and I'm surprised folks can think like this. Marriage is about sharing and even a child will tell you that. If the in-laws are any sensible they won't accept gifts from the son-in-law but its for them to decide.And stop receiving any gifts from either sides.



I don�t agree with this point. If I am doing something and taking care of my parents its my duty. it does not mean my wife also have to do tit-for-tat. It depends on the situation and circumstance. If she is the only daughter, her family situation is bad then we can think about it.

In this case, when her two other sisters and specially her brother also in the US, I don�t see the reason to support the in-laws. If you make more than enough it�s different. But when you are struggling to make your ends meet...I don�t support your point on this.

---

hot makeup Famous Paintings

most famous painting.

chisinau

07-23 01:26 AM

I am not familiar with legal procedures for US graduates.
Try this one: http://allnurses.com/forums/f75/ - it is the nursing forum, they might have relevant information for you.
Hope you will find an emploier.

---

more...

house famous paintings of love.

Mozart amp; Famous Love Quote

diptam

12-18 12:33 PM

My lawyer received it on Dec 16th - they said that they need at least 2 weeks to answer the RFE. They also mentioned that the RFE doesn''t ask for any specific paperwork , its like a Question-Answer Form.

a) Why do you need this guy
b) Can you find an american instead of this guy
c) How you benchmark performance in the company

etc...

diptam : Whether your I-140 is approved now?

---

tattoo Famous Love Scenes In Pictures

Fortune Held Back by Love

zinchak

09-11 09:06 PM

I have also posted about this drive on boards.immigration.com

---

more...

pictures famous paintings of love. love

Love

geesee

09-12 10:59 AM

Liked the calculator idea! Count me in..

One qns - how are we planning to catch media's attention? It was easier during flower campagin as flowers were clearly visible in fedex/ups trucks.. But the calculators would be inside a box...

---

dresses most famous painting.

most famous paintings

lost

09-07 10:36 AM

I'm only posting a response cause my response is sad and funny at same time. No one's beat me yet???

Came in Dec 1990
Been on various visas including F1 (grad and undergrad) and H1.
Didn't get to file GC till 2007 unfortunately...

Thanks all.

I'm in my mid thirties now. I came as a teen, fifteen.

So I wonder....should the dream act come through....could it work in my favor too lol? I came through no choice of my own (though legally) with my parents....

And do i get a GC for beating everyone on here :)

j/k.

Did your parents file for GC? What is their status now?

---

more...

makeup hair famous paintings. I LOVE

famous paintings of love.

HV000

09-28 11:50 PM

Is it possible to send a letter to SEN.CORNYN AND REP.LOFGREN demanding USCIS to release BACKLOG NUMBERS upto date and NUMBER OF VISAS used up for 2007 year??

---

girlfriend Fortune Held Back by Love

hot off of famous paintings.

SkilledWorker4GC

07-16 09:45 AM

What happened with sending out an email to all registered members?
We got to reach 3k by today.
Good Morning people.

A new beginning today. We missed our target of 2000 yesterday. Today we have a new target.

$3000.00 by mindnight EST.

Will we make it or will we miss again?

Common IV'rs, this a chance at redemption. Let us show the anti-immigrants that we are UNITED.

---

hairstyles [SOMALIA] - 4 Famous Paintings

famous paintings of love.

WeldonSprings

05-02 04:17 PM

Just responding to my quote- This question was also raised by Honorable House Democrat from Illinois Mr. Guterriez.I know everyone has looked at the Visa Bulletin. Here is a quote from it-

2. Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is at least 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.

So, don't you guys think that there more than 140,000 visas can be given away, if need me as it is this moment. So, I don't understand the retrogression???

---

buehler

07-20 08:17 AM

Actually it was lost by only 2 votes. Only 95 Senators voted and hence 57 votes would have been enough to carry it through. Really Sad. :(

---

santb1975

07-19 12:12 PM

I have been contributing 50$ a month so far. I upgraded that to 100$ every month. Please contribute.

Also I was wondering Isn't there a way to upgrade from 50$ to 100$ by changing the amount. I had to sign up for 100$ recurring and cancel the 50$ recurring contribution. Could be just me today :-)

---