Blog Feeds
01-04 08:10 AM
Perhaps there is a chance we'll see some action on the DREAM Act in 2011 albeit with some major tough to accept changes. The key areas likely to change are the education requirement (mandating actually receiving a degree versus simply attending school), the ability to sponsor relatives down the road when DREAM Act finally become citizens (at least 13 years out) and criminal bars on applying.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/anti-immigration-center-for-immigration-studies-suggests-willingness-to-compromise-on-dream-act.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/anti-immigration-center-for-immigration-studies-suggests-willingness-to-compromise-on-dream-act.html)
wallpaper FOR BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
raysaikat
06-22 12:00 AM
... I would like her to continue studies on H4 and change to F-1 via COS only if needed... Is this possible?
Yes.
... should my H1b remain valid till her COS to F-1 is approved? ...
Yes. The moment you lose your H1-B status, she loses her H4 status.
Yes.
... should my H1b remain valid till her COS to F-1 is approved? ...
Yes. The moment you lose your H1-B status, she loses her H4 status.
kirupa
05-10 03:22 PM
Your post is extremely scarce on details :) What exactly are you trying to do?
2011 towards cancer research.
eager_immi
07-02 03:18 PM
USCIS does not give a damn they are a govt agency that sift through paper very slowly every day. What makes you think they have a conscience and they will suddenly feel bad for you?
Yes i agree with you, Lets prepare our experience and fax them
Yes i agree with you, Lets prepare our experience and fax them
more...
Zeeman19
August 15th, 2006, 08:10 PM
I'm about to buy a Nikon DSLR and I need lens suggestions (for lenses under $500).
I'm also having a big debate on whether I should buy the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 or the Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 or if I should buy a Nikon lens.
I'm interested in general purpose zooms only.
I'm also having a big debate on whether I should buy the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 or the Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 or if I should buy a Nikon lens.
I'm interested in general purpose zooms only.
Macaca
07-11 08:13 AM
Unpopular Congress enduring tough times (http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN0923700020070710) By Steve Holland Reuters, Jul 10, 2007
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - These are tough times for the Democratic-led U.S. Congress, where partisan battles have led to little progress on big issues and have made lawmakers collectively less popular than President George W. Bush.
Congress, typically never all that popular to begin with, starts the second half of 2007 with an anemic job approval rating of about 25 percent, down from 43 percent in January, with one Gallup poll ranking lawmakers at 14 percent.
Experts attribute the woeful rankings to an inability to force a change in direction in Iraq, the priority Democrats campaigned on to gain power in both the House of Representatives and the Senate in last November's elections.
But that is not all. There has been little to show on other priorities, including a change in Social Security and other entitlement programs that will run out of money in the years ahead, in addition to overhauling a health care system that has left millions uninsured and a broken immigration policy.
"I think Americans were expecting a great deal from the new Congress, and Congress has always been held in low esteem, but Congress really hasn't delivered on what it promised, especially on Iraq," said Paul Light, a congressional expert who is a professor at New York University.
Democrats in charge of Congress insist they have made progress on several issues, like increasing the minimum hourly wage and getting money for victims of the 2005 Katrina hurricane. They blame the Republican minority for a failure on others such as immigration, greater energy independence, and on negotiation of lower-priced drugs for Medicare.
"I'm not really much for polls," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. "We're going to continue doing what we think is the right thing for the American public in spite of a White House and the Republicans who are stalling every step of the way."
IRAQ DEBATE
Democrats drew a line in the sand over Iraq in the spring, using a $100 billion war spending bill to try to force Bush to accept a troop withdrawal date.
The effort failed miserably, with Bush finally getting what he wanted with no strings attached, and the White House saw the fractious debate as taking time away from work on other priorities.
"They've proven that they're not capable of taking on big issues," an administration official said.
Democrats beg to differ, pointing out that under their stewardship the Congress has resumed its traditional watchdog role over an administration they feel got off scot-free under Republican leadership.
"I would say in the first six months, gauging how things operate here from the majority, that we had some important work to do," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California. "We had to drain the swamp. We had to create the oversight."
With American patience running thin over the Iraq war and casualties rising, Democrats may eventually force a change in direction in the unpopular war, an effort being renewed this week on Capitol Hill.
The Iraq situation has so infuriated the Democratic left that Cindy Sheehan, the California liberal who began a long protest against Bush after her soldier son Casey was killed in Iraq, is talking about running against Pelosi in 2008.
"I think the decline in support (for Congress) since the Democrats took over reflects in part the unhappiness of the base in the inability of Democrats to immediately stop the war in Iraq," said Thomas Mann, a congressional expert at the Brookings Institution.
The analysts say Congress' low poll numbers also reflect an altogether negative mood among Americans who are tired of the war, fed up with rising gasoline prices and worried about their jobs in a changing economy.
But how all this plays out in the 2008 election is hard to say. Incumbent lawmakers, while collectively held in low esteem, rarely fail to win re-election.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - These are tough times for the Democratic-led U.S. Congress, where partisan battles have led to little progress on big issues and have made lawmakers collectively less popular than President George W. Bush.
Congress, typically never all that popular to begin with, starts the second half of 2007 with an anemic job approval rating of about 25 percent, down from 43 percent in January, with one Gallup poll ranking lawmakers at 14 percent.
Experts attribute the woeful rankings to an inability to force a change in direction in Iraq, the priority Democrats campaigned on to gain power in both the House of Representatives and the Senate in last November's elections.
But that is not all. There has been little to show on other priorities, including a change in Social Security and other entitlement programs that will run out of money in the years ahead, in addition to overhauling a health care system that has left millions uninsured and a broken immigration policy.
"I think Americans were expecting a great deal from the new Congress, and Congress has always been held in low esteem, but Congress really hasn't delivered on what it promised, especially on Iraq," said Paul Light, a congressional expert who is a professor at New York University.
Democrats in charge of Congress insist they have made progress on several issues, like increasing the minimum hourly wage and getting money for victims of the 2005 Katrina hurricane. They blame the Republican minority for a failure on others such as immigration, greater energy independence, and on negotiation of lower-priced drugs for Medicare.
"I'm not really much for polls," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. "We're going to continue doing what we think is the right thing for the American public in spite of a White House and the Republicans who are stalling every step of the way."
IRAQ DEBATE
Democrats drew a line in the sand over Iraq in the spring, using a $100 billion war spending bill to try to force Bush to accept a troop withdrawal date.
The effort failed miserably, with Bush finally getting what he wanted with no strings attached, and the White House saw the fractious debate as taking time away from work on other priorities.
"They've proven that they're not capable of taking on big issues," an administration official said.
Democrats beg to differ, pointing out that under their stewardship the Congress has resumed its traditional watchdog role over an administration they feel got off scot-free under Republican leadership.
"I would say in the first six months, gauging how things operate here from the majority, that we had some important work to do," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California. "We had to drain the swamp. We had to create the oversight."
With American patience running thin over the Iraq war and casualties rising, Democrats may eventually force a change in direction in the unpopular war, an effort being renewed this week on Capitol Hill.
The Iraq situation has so infuriated the Democratic left that Cindy Sheehan, the California liberal who began a long protest against Bush after her soldier son Casey was killed in Iraq, is talking about running against Pelosi in 2008.
"I think the decline in support (for Congress) since the Democrats took over reflects in part the unhappiness of the base in the inability of Democrats to immediately stop the war in Iraq," said Thomas Mann, a congressional expert at the Brookings Institution.
The analysts say Congress' low poll numbers also reflect an altogether negative mood among Americans who are tired of the war, fed up with rising gasoline prices and worried about their jobs in a changing economy.
But how all this plays out in the 2008 election is hard to say. Incumbent lawmakers, while collectively held in low esteem, rarely fail to win re-election.
more...
juan
09-06 04:39 PM
Will it not affect the green card processing? I mean, if during the green card process, they ask for the ITR and they see the additional income from the rental property, won't they deny the I-140 or I-485?
2010 breast cancer research.
speddi
07-11 05:05 PM
Hi,
Here is my situation.
During the july fiasco last year, I applied for I-485 through Company A(I am still working for it). My I-140 is approved. PD : Aug, 2006, EB-2
At the same time, another company (Company B) applied for I-140 through labor substitution(PD: Nov, 2005, EB-2) and it got approved in May this year. I have a receipt notice of that application but no copy of approval notice. I dont intend to join Company B and dont expect any support from them.
Now that PD is June 1, 2006 for EB-2, is there any way I can use the PD of Company B with out the approval notice? If so, can someone point me to the right direction. Thank you.
Here is my situation.
During the july fiasco last year, I applied for I-485 through Company A(I am still working for it). My I-140 is approved. PD : Aug, 2006, EB-2
At the same time, another company (Company B) applied for I-140 through labor substitution(PD: Nov, 2005, EB-2) and it got approved in May this year. I have a receipt notice of that application but no copy of approval notice. I dont intend to join Company B and dont expect any support from them.
Now that PD is June 1, 2006 for EB-2, is there any way I can use the PD of Company B with out the approval notice? If so, can someone point me to the right direction. Thank you.
more...
willy007
10-23 11:02 AM
Hi,
I am asking this for my sister who is working under J1 (start in October 2007 and valid for 1 year). She already get a J1 visa stamp and re-enter US as J1 status
1. Change of employer is not permissible in J1. Can she submit a new J1 petition and thus ending her current J1 petition early?
2. How about the 2-year home residency requirement (HRR)? Does she need a waiver for the current J1 she is doing now OR can she satisfy the HRR after she finishes with the new J1? The new J1 will not end later than the current J1. So, practically she will be in J1 for 1 year only.
3. Does she need to get another J1 visa stamp and re-enter the US?
Thank you.
I am asking this for my sister who is working under J1 (start in October 2007 and valid for 1 year). She already get a J1 visa stamp and re-enter US as J1 status
1. Change of employer is not permissible in J1. Can she submit a new J1 petition and thus ending her current J1 petition early?
2. How about the 2-year home residency requirement (HRR)? Does she need a waiver for the current J1 she is doing now OR can she satisfy the HRR after she finishes with the new J1? The new J1 will not end later than the current J1. So, practically she will be in J1 for 1 year only.
3. Does she need to get another J1 visa stamp and re-enter the US?
Thank you.
hair The Breast Cancer Research
sk8er
04-16 09:05 PM
Can you use your spouse's cross-chargeability after you have filed for your I-140 already?
How time consuming is this for the USCIS to acknowledge?
Does spouse also need to have a GC application filed at that time or if your spouse is from a non-retrogressed country but not working then you can use her also?
How time consuming is this for the USCIS to acknowledge?
Does spouse also need to have a GC application filed at that time or if your spouse is from a non-retrogressed country but not working then you can use her also?
more...
Comiccmadd
07-23 09:19 AM
i would ! i can imagine my granny's reaction:D
hot The Breast Cancer Research
chotu ustad
08-22 02:12 PM
Hi! My drivers license has expired which was issued in Indianapolis, and I renewed the drivers license at Indianapolis which I could not get transferred to Florida ( no mail forwarding). Now question is, I want to renew new drivers license from Florida, will there be any problem if I use my old H-1B which was issued at Indianapolis, although I have shifted to Florida in a new job where my old H-1B transfer is till under process? what will the implications of using the old H1B?( I am still getting paid from my old employe)r
more...
house a national symbol.
gurumath77
10-30 09:52 AM
Hi All,
I just gave my fingerprints today. I got a match warning for almost all my fingers. I dont remember giving all my finger prints to USCIS at any point of time.. At the max, I would have given thumb and index finger when i travelled.. does this mean i am in trouble?
Any input is appreciated!!
THANKS
I just gave my fingerprints today. I got a match warning for almost all my fingers. I dont remember giving all my finger prints to USCIS at any point of time.. At the max, I would have given thumb and index finger when i travelled.. does this mean i am in trouble?
Any input is appreciated!!
THANKS
tattoo breast cancer research.
sunny1000
11-10 04:09 PM
I think it should be "lawful permanent resident". Someone with experience can answer better since I don't even have my greencard yet...:-)
more...
pictures symbol of Cancer Research.
chil3
04-13 01:23 PM
it would be in minus.....
GC approvals are getting lesser & lesser...
GC approvals are getting lesser & lesser...
dresses pink breast cancer symbol
Blog Feeds
04-23 11:32 AM
As of April 6, 2009, all applicants for non-immigrant visas at the U.S. consulate in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, must now enroll at the Applicant Service Center (ASC) fingerprint appointment before attending the interview appointment. ASC employees take applicants’ pictures and fingerprints and provide that data to the consulate. Non-immigrant visas are issued to foreign nationals seeking to enter the United States on a temporary basis. More information is available at:
www.ciudadjuarez.usconsulate.gov/non-immigrant_visas.html (http://www.ciudadjuarez.usconsulate.gov/non-immigrant_visas.html)
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/o39aUeP8HSg/)
www.ciudadjuarez.usconsulate.gov/non-immigrant_visas.html (http://www.ciudadjuarez.usconsulate.gov/non-immigrant_visas.html)
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/o39aUeP8HSg/)
more...
makeup the Breast Cancer Research
webm
01-07 02:40 PM
What will happen if my renewal EAD is still in the process while my current EAD is going to expire soon (in a week's period)?
Can I work during the expired period?
Please help..:confused:
No you shouldn't work during that expired period..and resume to work after you get new extension EAD card.
Can I work during the expired period?
Please help..:confused:
No you shouldn't work during that expired period..and resume to work after you get new extension EAD card.
girlfriend for Breast Cancer Research
mailsunnydeol
08-07 11:54 AM
Progress so far:
Aug 3: Card Production Ordered email received
Aug 6: Approval Notice Sent email received
Aug 7: Welcome Notice Received by Lawyer
Aug 3: Card Production Ordered email received
Aug 6: Approval Notice Sent email received
Aug 7: Welcome Notice Received by Lawyer
hairstyles to Breast Cancer Research,
gc_wisc
04-13 10:42 PM
I'm currently on H1B with a pending employment based I485 (EB3 category). I married my wife (USC) a year and an half ago and we decided to file a family based I1485 petition. We are currently preparing the forms and we have a few questions.
1. I485: Application Type Question: In my employment based I485, the option a. was selected for Application Type (An immigrant petition giving me an immediately available immigrant visa number that has been approved). What should we choose for this family based petition.
2. I765: (a) Applying For: When the company applied for employment based 485 few years ago, I got my EAD. I never used EAD as I always had my H1B. Hence, should I select "Permission to accept employment" or "Renewal of my permission to accept employment (attach previous employment authorization)"?
(b) Question 16: Eligibility under 8 CFR 274a.12 ( ) ( ) ( ). For my employment based application, it was (C) (9) ( ). What should it be for my family based application now?
Thanks in advance.
1. I485: Application Type Question: In my employment based I485, the option a. was selected for Application Type (An immigrant petition giving me an immediately available immigrant visa number that has been approved). What should we choose for this family based petition.
2. I765: (a) Applying For: When the company applied for employment based 485 few years ago, I got my EAD. I never used EAD as I always had my H1B. Hence, should I select "Permission to accept employment" or "Renewal of my permission to accept employment (attach previous employment authorization)"?
(b) Question 16: Eligibility under 8 CFR 274a.12 ( ) ( ) ( ). For my employment based application, it was (C) (9) ( ). What should it be for my family based application now?
Thanks in advance.
krishna_brc
06-25 01:30 PM
~~~please advise~~~
wandmaker
02-01 02:39 PM
Support IV and help yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment